ADVERTISEMENTs

India slams Canada for naming High Commissioner Verma ‘person of interest’ in probe case

India responded in a caustic manner. It suggested that the matter was linked to the political challenges that the Trudeau government is facing on the domestic front in Canada.

High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma / X/@hci_ottawa

Diplomatic relations between India and Canada took a hit over Canadian allegations that the Indian High Commissioner was a “person of interest” in a Canadian investigation. New Delhi responding unusually sharply, backing its High Commissioner, described the charge as  a “preposterous imputation”.

It is said that the investigation relates to the June 2023 murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a pro-Khalistani activist. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has more than once since claimed to have evidence of India’s alleged role. No evidence has so far come out.

On Oct. 13, Ottawa informed New Delhi of the situation involving High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma and a few other diplomats.

India responded in a caustic manner. It suggested that the matter was linked with the political challenges that the Trudeau government is facing on the domestic front in Canada.

The Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement in which it said, “We received a diplomatic communication from Canada yesterday suggesting that the Indian High Commissioner and other diplomats are ‘persons of interest’ in a matter related to an investigation in that country. The Government of India strongly rejects these preposterous imputations and ascribes them to the political agenda of the Trudeau Government that is centred around vote bank politics.” ,

The statement wondered why Canada had not yet provided any evidence. “Since Prime Minister Trudeau made certain allegations in September 2023, the Canadian Government has not shared a shred of evidence with the Government of India, despite many requests from our side. This latest step follows interactions that have again witnessed assertions without any facts. This leaves little doubt that on the pretext of an investigation, there is a deliberate strategy of smearing India for political gains.”

The statement described the accusations by Trudeau as acts of “hostility”. “Prime Minister Trudeau’s hostility to India has long been in evidence. In 2018, his visit to India, which was aimed at currying favour with a vote bank, rebounded to his discomfort. His Cabinet has included individuals who have openly associated with an extremist and separatist agenda regarding India. His naked interference in Indian internal politics in December 2020 showed how far he was willing to go in this regard.”

The ministry charged the Canadian leadership of hobnobbing with the Khalistani ideologues. “That his Government was dependent on a political party, whose leader openly espouses a separatist ideology vis-à-vis India, only aggravated matters. Under criticism for turning a blind eye to foreign interference in Canadian politics, his Government has deliberately brought in India in an attempt to mitigate the damage. This latest development targeting Indian diplomats is now the next step in that direction. It is no coincidence that it takes place as Prime Minister Trudeau is to depose before a Commission on foreign interference. It also serves the anti-India separatist agenda that the Trudeau Government has constantly pandered to for narrow political gains.”

Charging the leadership of “consciously” providing space to “violent extremists and terrorists to harass, threaten and intimidate Indian diplomats and community leaders in Canada”, the statement said, “all these activities have been justified in the name of freedom of speech. Some individuals who have entered Canada illegally have been fast-tracked for citizenship”. It added: “Multiple extradition requests from the Government of India in respect of terrorists and organized crime leaders living in Canada have been disregarded.”

Backing the Indian High Commissioner to Canada, the statement said, “Sanjay Kumar Verma is India’s senior most serving diplomat with a distinguished career spanning 36 years” and “has been Ambassador in Japan and Sudan, while also serving in Italy, Turkiye, Vietnam and China”. The “aspersions cast on him by the Government of Canada are ludicrous and deserve to be treated with contempt”.

India now “reserves the right to take further steps in response to these latest efforts of the Canadian Government to concoct allegations against Indian diplomats”, it said.

Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

E Paper