A supporter reacts to early election results at Democratic presidential nominee U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris' election night rally during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, at Howard University, in Washington, U.S., November 5, 2024. REUTERS/Daniel Cole/File Photo / Reuters

Democrats are facing a painful reckoning over Kamala Harris's drubbing at the hands of Donald Trump in the US presidential election, as shock gives way to anger and recrimination in the aftermath of a devastating repudiation.

Lawmakers and strategists looking for someone to blame for Nov. 5 wipeout have so far been more likely to target President Joe Biden than Harris, who is regarded as having done a decent job with the short time she had to campaign.

The election night disaster -- Trump's triumph was accompanied by a Republican "red wave" in the Senate -- has proved to be a Rorschach test, with rival factions each offering reasons for the defeat informed by their particular brand of Democratic politics.

The circular firing squad began with progressive senator Bernie Sanders arguing in a scathing statement that a party that had forsaken the working class should not be surprised to "find that the working class has abandoned them."

That prompted an angry rebuke from Democratic National Committee chairman Jaime Harrison, who dismissed Sanders's thesis as "straight up BS" and posted a long list of Biden's achievements for low income families.

New York congressman Ritchie Torres hit out at what he sees as smug political correctness on the left, insisting that Trump had "no greater friend" than activists alienating voters with "absurdities like 'Defund the Police'... or 'Latinx.'"

- 'Devastating loss' -

Harris has escaped the harshest criticism, as she is regarded as having had insufficient time to campaign thanks to Biden's initial insistence on running again at 81, despite having promised to be a bridge to the next generation.

The aging president's sluggishness in bowing out after a disastrous debate performance against Trump deepened the challenge, as Harris had to start her campaign in July as a relative unknown, despite being the vice president.

Billionaire former Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg, who feels that Biden's campaign should never have got as far as the June 27 debate, attacked the president's team in a commentary for Bloomberg for covering up his shortcomings "until they became undeniable on live TV."

Other Democrats blamed the ongoing economic reverberations of the coronavirus pandemic, which caused governments to fall across the globe amid anger over soaring inflation.

Biden himself heaped praise on his vice president in a televised White House address Nov. 7.

"She gave her whole heart and effort, and she and her entire team should be proud of the campaign they ran," he told the nation.

But Harris isn't considered entirely blameless.

While there is little she could have done about post-pandemic price hikes, many congressional Democrats told reporters behind the scenes that Harris's team overestimated abortion access as an election winner and dropped the ball on the economy.

Another criticism is that Harris failed to distance herself from Biden once she was handed the torch, despite his approval ratings being underwater at 40 percent.

This was exemplified in her answer that "not a thing comes to mind" when she was asked on a daytime talk show how she might have governed differently from her boss.

- 'Bigger tent' -

Other critics say she picked the wrong running mate in Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

But evidence that Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania would have been any more effective in helping Harris win the predominantly white, working class Rust Belt is threadbare.

Harris has also been criticized for not being clearer in disavowing unpopular leftist views she held in 2019 and explaining transparently why she tacked so dramatically to the center.

Under this theory, Harris's outreach to Republicans, and the assurance that "my values have not changed," were not enough to reassure voters that they were really seeing the real woman and understood what made her tick.

Yet for all the talk of the need to learn lessons, some Democrats were keen for the bloodletting to be over so that the focus could return to opposing Trump.

"Listen, I'm all in for the messaging/strategy biopsy. Need to build a bigger tent; use economic populism as the tentpole; be less judgmental and exclusionary," Chris Murphy, a US senator from Connecticut, posted on X.

"But folks, (Trump) might not be lying about the round ups and political prosecutions. Job one is to get ready for that."